LMLK--Typologies |
LMLK Home Biblical Accounts NonBiblical Accounts Theories HBRN MMST SUKE ZYF Generic x (cannot classify) 2-Top 2-Divided 2-Undivided 4-Cursory 4-Lapidarist Jars Personal Seals Incisions Paleography Typologies Corpus Stratigraphy Geography Displays Publications Credits Updates |
This is a categorization of the different seals (at least 21 known so far) that produced the impressions, & only clear/certain impressions are considered for these categories since fuzzy/uncertain ones may be misleading. In some cases a clear impression may also be misleading if the seal slipped, or was depressed more than once by the potter, or wasn't cleaned by the potter (resulting in loss of detail from hardened clay stuck in crevices). This website uses a unique system with 3 or 4 characters described below along with cross-reference tables to the systems used by scholars. An "x" can be used for any of the characters that cannot be discerned. (Explanations of the seal orientations (x:00) & pottery types (ACC, AGC, AGG, SCC, SGC, & SGG) are on the Jars page; explanations of the incision types (0, 1, 2, C, P) are on the Incisions page.) The first character designates the inscription name:
The third character designates the inscription style:
Website TypologyNote: These line drawings were created by placing a clear sheet of film over the computer image & tracing the outlines. All available photos (quantities shown in parentheses) contributed since they were resized to similar dimensions. Only a few drawings need dotted lines to indicate the unknown portion of the seal. Also, please be aware that the letters shown in these drawings are not nearly as accurate as the ones shown on the Paleography page since those were generated directly via computer images of the seals & these drawings were freehand (i.e., traced) copies. The main purpose of line drawings is to show the seal features as clearly as possible without the distractions associated with actual photos such as shadows & erosion.
Note: In Tel Aviv vol. 37 #1, Lipschits, Sergi, & Koch attempted to apply this website's typology to Lemaire's, which is erroneous (see Grena's rebuttal on The Bible & Interpretation website). |
Sorted by Website (27 types listed; 21 types known)
|
Sorted by LEMAIRE (22 types listed; 20 types known)Andre Lemaire presented this system in "Classification des Estampilles Royales Judeennes", published in 1981 ("Eretz-Israel 15", pp. 54-60, Plate VIII).The first character:
|
Sorted by WELTEN (29 types)Peter Welten presented this system in "Die Konigs-Stempel", published in 1969 (pp. 36-44).The first character designates the inscription name:
Note: The line drawings are from "Die Konigs-Stempel" by Peter Welten.
|
Sorted by DIRINGER/LAPP/AHARONI (24 types)David Diringer grouped all LMLK seals into 3 classes in "On Ancient Hebrew Inscriptions Discovered at Tell Ed-Duweir (Lachish)--II", published in 1941 (PEQ vol. 73, pp. 91-101). Paul W. Lapp listed LMLK inscription variants in "Late Royal Seals From Judah", published in 1960 (BASOR 158, p. 15, Fig. 1). Yohanan Aharoni added a few inscription variants to the list & attached lowercase letters to the table in "Excavations at Ramat Rahel: Seasons 1959 & 1960", published in 1962 (p. 46).The first classifier (Roman numeral) designates the icon's wing design:
|
Number of visits: |
This page was created on February 23, 2002, & last updated on January 2, 2011 |