LMLK--Impressions that Cannot be Classified by Inscriptions |
LMLK Home Biblical Accounts NonBiblical Accounts Theories HBRN MMST SUKE ZYF Generic x (cannot classify) 2-Top 2-Divided 2-Undivided 4-Cursory 4-Lapidarist Jars Personal Seals Incisions Paleography Typologies Corpus Stratigraphy Geography Displays Publications Credits Updates |
Sometimes the seal type cannot be classified with certainty (beyond the basic seal design of x2x, x4C, & x4L) due to:
Visit the Stamp Interpretation Tricks page for more information about problems with seal impression identifications.
Type x2UNote: Probably an H2U; possibly a Z2U Note: This impression also appears in "The Renewed Archaeological Excavations at Lachish (1973-1994) Volume IV" by David Ussishkin Note: Probably a Z2U; possibly an H2U Note: Probably an H2U; possibly a Z2U; the apparent tau in the bottom-left register is probably a speckle, not a letter Note: Probably an H2U; possibly a Z2U Type x2xR (rigid wing design)Note: Probably an S2DR based on the wing & 2 visible letters in the top register Note: Probably an M2T based on the wing design & possibly a portion of the tau remaining Note: Probably an M2T based on the wing design & possibly a portion of the tau remaining Note: Probably an S2DR; possibly an M2T Type x2xClick here to visit a separate page since there are so many other 2-winged seal impressions that cannot be sub-classified with certaintyType x4CClick here to visit a separate page since there are so many other 4-winged seal impressions with cursory inscriptions that cannot be sub-classified with certaintyType x4LClick here to visit a separate page since there are so many other 4-winged seal impressions with lapidarist inscriptions that cannot be sub-classified with certaintyType xxx(LMLK seal impressions that cannot be sub-classified by icons or inscriptions)Note: Probably an x2x; possibly an x4x Note: Probably an x4x; possibly an x2x |
Number of visits: |
This page was created on March 21, 2002, & last updated on September 22, 2004 |